New Video Emerges. Citizens Alerting Law Enforcement of Shooter. Crime Theory Ironclad. Who Has the Motive, Means and Opportunity? You Guessed Right

Our Crime Theory Can Not Be Refuted

[video] Look how many attendees are trying to alert law enforcement

Prevailing Crime Theory: Who ordered the hit on Trump?

It’s one of 3 organizations. You make the call.

I am not going to spend any time getting wrapped up or bogged down in things leaked to US mainstream shit journalists about the alleged shooter's life, upbringing, his laptop (that may or may not belong to him), his years at Bethel Park High School (all of this is secondary to the true crime) which is failure to protect (The only thing the secret service is funded and trained to do)

Moreover, all that is just ancillary data; some can be verified, and others require reading tea leaves.

However, below can be verified with 100% certainty

The proof is 100% ironclad, and the key data points in play are simply this:

• The Secret Service has a staff of 7,000 across 150 locations with a 3.2 billion dollar budget.

• They have one job, one mission: to protect one person.

• They inexplicably failed to station men on rooftops, an essential security measure.

• Rooftops that have clear shot lines to the President would be determined in the first hour of devising any worthwhile protection plan (security detail)

• No amount of questioning or logic can override this failure to staff the rooftops with the Secret Service.

• They have months to prepare for each rally and have access to aerial photos for their staffing assignments.

• This lack of planning or oversight can't be explained away.

• It can not be attributed to error, oversight, incompetence, or a lack of clarity about the mission.

• The only plausible explanation for this gross negligence is that someone higher than the Secret Service wanted the President dead, as intentional failure to secure a rooftop with a clear shot to the President is tantamount to consenting or evidence of orchestrating an assassination.

• Only three entities would have the power to orchestrate such a failure to protect operation

• And any critical thinker (like our readers) can easily deduce that they are essentially 'one in the same.'

• The interest of the Deep State or (military industrial complex)

These are the 3 likely suspects (again, in various scenarios they overlap)

1. The CIA is veiled in secrecy, has no accountability, and has a profound history of going rogue, which could explain the failure to secure a rooftop with a clear shot to the President.

2. The Federal Reserve also has no accountability to any president. It is an independent (private organization). It has a monopoly on issuing currency and would be threatened by any President who promotes the notion of a Gold Standard ( the opposite of the Federal Reserve note) It’s also worth noting that whenever anyone in the World devises a payment system that is backed by Gold the same three entities behave the same. Just look at photos of Gaddafi when he he floated out his Gold Dinar)

3. NATO, they hate Trump because he has stated he wants NATO used as a defensive entity not an offensive entity. He has vowed to honor the agreement between James Baker (Secretary of State in 1990) and Gorbachev that NATO would not progress "not an inch" towards the East towards Russia's border.

Look how far NATO has expanded towards Russia's border since this agreement, look at the colored in Red since 1990 to understand.

This is why Professor Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago has explained why it is logical, rational, and reasonable that Putin can't allow Ukraine to fall under NATO, and the US is funding NATO. 

Keep in mind that all these entities serve at the behest of the Federal Reserve; without printed money for war adventures, none of the above entities would be able to profit from these war stocks, munitions, and corporations.

So, the CIA, Federal Reserve, and NATO are all bureaus of the Military Industrial Complex.

• Federal Reserve, the funding bureau

• CIA, the dirty tricks department (isn't it a dirty trick to fail to put security staff on rooftops with a clear shot to the President?)

• NATO, the war engine

  ---

Again,
There are only two buildings in the local area of Trump's Rally, and one was left totally empty.

Why was there not even any police or Secret Service officers on the rooftop which would've stopped the shooter?

Even a normal person, who has never done security, can see this is inexcusable.

Jonathan Willis, the officer in the famous photo of the two snipers on the roof at Trump's rally, has informed the public that he had the assassin in his sights but the head of the Secret Service refused to give the order to take out the perpetrator.

Secret Service snipers literally watched the shooter climb onto the rooftop and set up his rifle, and let him take the shot at Trump. Footage shows the Secret Service spent 42 seconds staring down the barrel of their snipers at the shooter without doing anything.

Secret Service snipers are usually some of the best snipers in the world, so it's incredibly unlikely they would miss the shooter.

Secret Service took so long that the crowd had time to record the shooter, and warn nearby officers of the shooter.

People nearby said the shooter was there for almost 3 minutes before he took the shot at President Trump. This means the Secret Service probably watched the shooter set up his rifle and take the shot before they shot him themselves.

Because of this, you can only come to two conclusions.

1. Either these two secret service snipers ignored the shooter, and refused to neutralise him before he opened fire.
2. Or they had and followed orders to not shoot the man, despite seeing he was clearly a threat - and they ignored those orders once he opened fire.

In Conclusion

• Gold and Silver put politicians on a constrained monetary system meaning they can not go on war profiteering adventures

Read Part I in our series

Read Part II in our series