Iran launches waves of missiles at Israel in response to attacks
Operation True Promise 3 is the name given by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to a large-scale missile attack launched by Iran against Israel
Foreword:
Throughout history, the cycle of war and currency debasement has repeated itself with ruthless predictability. The Peloponnesian War saw Athens exhaust the famed silver mines of Laurion, transforming coins that once boasted 95% purity into little more than silver-plated tokens, as the state scrambled to fund its endless battles with Sparta.
Rome, in its imperial decline, debased the denarius, stripping it of its value to sustain military campaigns. Spain’s golden age crumbled as it bled the silver riches of Latin America dry, only to see its empire collapse under the weight of its own ambition. European monarchs, desperate to finance their wars, issued paper bonds and promissory notes—precursors to modern fiat currency—often funded by the very same profiteers who supplied both sides of the conflict.
This pattern has never been broken. The war machine is fed by the printing press, by paper promises, and by those who stand to gain from perpetual conflict.
As we face a new era of global tension, we must ask: will the old lessons be heeded, or will the cycle of war and debasement spin once more?
A Powder Keg Ignited: False Flags, Provocations, and the Path to War
The Middle East stands at the precipice. In a stunning escalation, Iran has launched ballistic missile strikes against Israel, with at least one missile reportedly hitting a nuclear research site in Tel Aviv. The attack is not just an act of war—it is a statement: Iran is willing to strike at the heart of Israel’s nuclear infrastructure. Tehran has also officially warned France, Britain, and the United States that any involvement in repelling Iranian attacks will be met with direct retaliation against military bases, ships, and naval vessels in the Gulf and beyond.
But as the missiles fly and the rhetoric intensifies, a darker possibility looms. Could we be on the verge of a false flag operation—one that draws the United States directly into the conflict?
History is replete with examples of intelligence agencies manipulating events to justify military action. The Gulf of Tonkin incident in Vietnam, the fabricated evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and the notorious “babies thrown from incubators” story all serve as cautionary tales. In each case, public opinion was swayed by carefully crafted narratives, often with devastating consequences.
So, what happens when a country with nothing left to lose decides to escalate? And who stands to gain from a crisis that could engulf the entire region?
Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad, is renowned for its boldness and ingenuity. Its history of covert operations—from assassinations to sabotage—demonstrates a willingness to take extraordinary risks to protect national interests. With Iran’s recent missile strikes on Tel Aviv, the pressure on Israel’s leadership is immense. The temptation to engineer a pretext for war—perhaps by staging an attack on American soil and blaming it on Iran—may be overwhelming.
But is this just speculation, or is there real evidence to suggest such a plot is underway?
Recent reporting has highlighted the deep involvement of the United States in the Iran-Israel conflict. American intelligence and military assets are already deployed throughout the region, and any escalation could quickly draw Washington into the fray. Iran’s warnings to the US and its allies are clear: stay out, or face the consequences. Yet, with American lives potentially at risk, the political calculus could shift overnight.
What if the next attack is not in Tel Aviv or Tehran, but in New York or Washington? How would the American public respond to such an event?
The risk of a false flag operation is not hypothetical. Intelligence experts have long warned that in times of crisis, the temptation to manipulate events for strategic gain is at its highest. The current standoff between Iran and Israel provides the perfect cover for such a maneuver. The public, still reeling from decades of war and intelligence scandals, must remain vigilant.
Can we afford to take the official narrative at face value? Or must we demand transparency and accountability before it is too late?
The stakes could not be higher. Iran’s missile strikes have already pushed the region to the brink of all-out war. The threat of a wider conflict—one that could draw in the United States and its allies—is now a real and present danger. In this environment, skepticism is not just advisable; it is essential.
As the world holds its breath, one question remains: Will we allow ourselves to be manipulated into another devastating conflict, or will we demand the truth before it’s too late?
How Gold and Silver Fix the Problem of Printed Money Funding Wars
Throughout history, the ability to print money has made it easy for governments to finance wars—often with disastrous consequences for ordinary people. Gold and silver, by contrast, offer a different kind of money: one that can’t be created out of thin air. These precious metals have intrinsic value, and that value is recognized worldwide. When a country’s money is backed by gold or silver, governments can’t simply print more whenever they need funds for war.
Limited Supply Means Real Limits on Spending
Gold and silver are rare. They must be mined, refined, and stored. This means that a government using a gold or silver standard can’t just decide to spend more on a war without having the actual metal to back up its spending. If a government wants to raise money for a war, it must either raise taxes, borrow from its citizens, or use up its gold and silver reserves. This forces policymakers to think carefully before starting or escalating conflicts, because the costs are real and immediate.
Preventing Inflation and Protecting Savings
When governments print money to fund wars, the result is usually inflation. Prices go up, and the value of people’s savings goes down. But with gold and silver, the money supply is limited by the amount of metal available. This helps keep prices stable and protects people’s purchasing power. In times of war, this stability is especially important, as it helps maintain public confidence in the currency and the government.
Encouraging Fiscal Responsibility
A gold or silver standard encourages governments to be more responsible with their finances. Because they can’t just print more money, they must make hard choices about how to spend their limited resources. This often leads to more cautious decision-making and less reckless military action. Historically, countries on a gold or silver standard have been less likely to engage in prolonged or unnecessary wars, because the financial constraints are real and tangible.
How Printed Money Fuels Wars
On the other hand, when money is just paper or digital entries, governments can create as much as they want. This makes it easy to finance wars without facing immediate consequences. The costs are pushed into the future, often in the form of debt or inflation, and future generations are left to pay the bill. This creates a cycle where wars become easier to start and harder to stop, because the true cost is hidden.
Conclusion
Gold and silver fix the problem of printed money funding wars by imposing real limits on government spending. They force governments to confront the true cost of conflict, protect people’s savings from inflation, and encourage more responsible decision-making. In a world where printed money makes it easy to finance endless wars, a return to gold and silver could help break the cycle of conflict and economic instability.
end of segment